Ryan O'Meara    16-03-2009,

Well, when it comes down to it, it's a simple case of an over enthusiastic sub editor at The Sun. They basically made a simple error and assumed DogsBlog was some sort of rescue charity (easy mistake to make) and we let them know that they had assumed incorrectly.

But, nevertheless, that didn't stop some whiny, pathetic bitch from posting on the Sun forum before they'd even had a chance to correct the wording!

Some people are too pathetic for words and I genuinely pity their sad existence on this mortal coil.

It's like those people who complain to a TV station when they think they've heard a naughty word or they seek to be offended on behalf of others.

Anyway, The Sun has put right their error - they're good like that - and all is well with the world.

Nice man! An honest well meaning lady says to the Sun that she does not believe that Dogsblog is a charity, O'Meara describes her as a  whiny, pathetic bitch. Says a lot about him.

Please be aware that O'Meara and K9 Media now (Total Pet Publishing.) Created and distributed this news feed, that the sun newspaper innocently published. Total Pet Publishing monitor every printed and published feed they produce. HERE is the response when other people asked him about him being a rescue centre.

"Dogsblog doesn't have a rescue centre" Then why are the Sun still saying he has? And why did he say personally on his own dogsblog "Charlie was handed in for rehoming at rescue centre, DogsBlog.com"

This is not the first time that O'Meara family has lied and attacked well meaning people. If, as he states it was a genuine error, then should he not be thanking this well meaning lady for pointing out the newspaper's mistake?

I can only conclude that his vicious attack on an innocent member of the general public, is because he was caught out lying about dogsblog's status as a charity, and a rescue centre. But then this would not be the first time this man has been caught out fraudulently claiming he is something he is not. For years he as has claimed he was a professional trainer when he is not. He now puts ex trainer since I pointed out his deception. When moved from K9 Magazine he continued to say he was the editor.

He attacked me for exposing that he supported individuals that seriously abused dogs. He personally promoted and supported over-feeding puppies until their eyes popped to calm them down. On top of that he abused the very people that buy his magazine, goods and services. Just look at these.

Scorn Poured On Dog Owners
Potentially Fatal Advice
Support of Dog Abuse and Bullying

In my personal opinion this man is a total liability for any company or backer he is involved with.

He stated categorically that he informed the Sun newspaper to remove the statement that he claims he is a charity. Though he has not mentioned the outright lie that he is a Rescue Centre. Except. HERE it states"Kim Bruce from the Charity" two and a half years after he told them it was wrong.It also states that they are a Rescue Centre on this PAGE. Who is Kim Bruce? In reality Kim Bruce is Mrs Kim O'Meara. No surprises there then. Unfortunately all's not quite well with the World is it Mr O'Meara?

The word charity has still not been removed from the Sun's article despite him being aware that it is a lie. Yet still he is stating he is a rescue centre. It appears this man is a con man and a scam merchant.

So why well over two and a half years after he claims he ordered the Sun to remove the inaccuracies were they still there? I am afraid this suggests that Mr O'Meara may be a charlatan and a fraudster. Don't be surprised if these links are shut down or altered. He will claim that it is all the Sun's mistake.

He owns a company that deals with PR and advertising. He claims his clients include: Nestle, Colgate Palmolive, Bayer, Procter & Gamble, Aviva, Royal Bank of Scotland, Pfizer and many others. You may just want to copy their executives in on the background of Mr O'Meara and his bunch of companies that appear to be conning the general public as to the their role regarding animal welfare.

I am fairly certain these companies he claims are clients, would never be complicit in deception, animal abuse or fraudulent claims. In fact the CEO of Proctor and Gamble was a client of mine.

O'Meara has just changed the name of K9 Media to Total Pet Publishing. Why would any company want to re brand their main holding company if they are successful?  Why would any company move from a printed magazine to an online one. Any number of reasons, but the main one is they are probably failing and have got themselves a bad name and financial problems.

Anyone dealing with these people are effectively supporting what he stands for. That includes animal abuse, lying, pouring scorn on dog owners, and publishing advise that is at best dangerous, and at worst fatal to our dogs. This man is a standing joke in the dog community and knowledgeable trainers and behaviourists think he is a fool.

Look at this: I took this from his Total Pet Publishing site. It clearly states they first used Total Pet Publishing's advertising channels in 2004.

Testimonials
“We first used Total Pet Publishing’s advertising channels in 2004 and continue to work successfully with them. We launched our Dog-Pod product with them and its been a great success. They helped us to really get our new product off the ground and its now grown to the point we have orders continually booked ahead of ourselves.” ~ Richard Lucy, Hamster Baskets"

2004?  Total Pet Publishing  was not formed until 2010. Once again lying and using information that is totally untrue and meant to deceive the general public. I do hope Richard Lucy has not been misquoted, and his comments manipulated?

I have received a number of serious allegations about Mr O'Meara and his behaviour. I cannot publish them until I can prove they are not just malicious gossip from people he has upset in the past.

Amazingly he is now claiming he is taking legal action against me. Yet the word charity is still on the Sun newspapers as is the lie that he is a rehoming centre. This is now many weeks after outing him for scurriously attacking a lady for pointing out innacuracies and allowing a newspaper to claim he is something he clearly is not.

Stan Rawlinson