Why Some Dog Treats Can Cause Concerns | Doglistener

Welcome to Stan Rawlinson's Doglistener website. Free Subscription to Stan's dog related fascinating newsletters

x

Why Some Dog Treats Can Cause Concerns

Serious Concerns About Many Popular Brands of Dog Treats

A Change in Feeding Habits: Dog and cat owners are becoming more discerning in their choice of food and treats for their pets.

There has been a tidal wave of concern about the ingredients in dog and cat food, now treats are also coming under scrutiny.

As Bob Dylan would say "The times they are a changing".

Those products are often based on profit and gain. Without apparent concern about the effect, they may have on our domestic animals.

Sometimes we do not realise or consider that the treats we are giving our pets could have a seriously detrimental effect on them.

We often feed them in rubber, synthetic and plastic containers. For instance, treats or food stuffed in Kong’s or other synthetic toys.

Plus many of the containers we keep them in can leak chemicals into the food or treats.

Certainly, artificial/synthetic chew toys can have a pernicious effect on our pets.

I have always been concerned about giving synthetics, nylon, or rubber chew products on their own or stuffed with goodies.

These dispensers often have lurid colours and our dogs chew on them daily.

Yet the colours are not natural, neither are the products, Many are made by chemical synthesis.

Feed treats in something natural like a calves hoof or cows horn which is natural and also edible. Not some synthetic rubber toy.

I also see owners feeding excellent dog food and then supplementing it with treats that are stuffed full of the very things they are trying to avoid in the dog food. It is vitally important that food and treats are genuinely good for our dogs, not just the manufacturers and shareholders pockets. I have written extensively about the impact that dog food has on the health, behaviour and wellbeing of our dogs. (1) Dog Food and Behaviour

I have also written about dog treats and obesity, especially treats made by the big four manufacturers. Mars, Nestle, Colgate-Palmolive and Proctor & Gamble.

These companies also manufacture most of the UK's processed pet foods, such as Bakers, Pedigree, Hills, Science Plan, Royal Canin, Purina and Eukanuba to name but a few.

I have also written articles about most of these brands and they are a real eye-opener. (2) Bakers and Pedigree and (3) Royal Canin, Burns and Hills Science Plan The big four mentioned above also make many of the bestselling treats; some with unhealthy fats plus very high-calorie contents.

However, it is not just the calorific content that concerns me, It is the ingredients that people are rightly concerned about. we are warned about artificial ingredients in our own food but this appears to be OK in dog food

Read my article. (4) Dog Treats and Obesity. One of the worst, in my opinion, is Pedigree Gravy Bones.

But may I say it is not alone amongst the many processed treats that are made and sold in their millions by the pet food industry.

Gravy Bones have a whopping 343 kcals per 100g. deemed to have one of the largest caloric uptakes on the pet treat market.

The ingredients include cereals, vegetable derivatives, animal derivatives and fats.antioxidants, preservatives, and colourants. They have now renamed them Biscrok.

I wonder why? Could it be the numerous negative reviews? Changing the name does not make the problem go away. Why not actually improve the ingredients rather than fiddling about with marketing ploys? Now that would be a step in the right direction.

The ingredients in gravy bones/biscrok are in my opinion appalling, all but one are deemed contentious, according to one of the leading experts and reviewers of dog food and treats (5) All About Dog Food

In fact, it only gets 1 out of 5 in the rankings and that was only because they do not have anything lower. There are many other treats that are also contentious and deemed to be poor quality they include Winalot Shapes, ( Nestle) Bakers Sizzlers, Bakers Allsorts (Nestle) and Markies (Pedigree Mars).

Every one of them is part of the big four manufacturers mentioned earlier. Are you aware that Mars who own and make all pedigree products, also own James Wellbeloved and Royal Canin?

Pedigree Dentastix: This is one of the most popular treats on the market. What surprises me is that people actually believe it is good for their dogs.

Natural Poultry Flavor is made from animal digest that has not yet undergone decomposition or rotting. The ‘digest’ is chemically treated with heat, acids and enzymes to produce the final concentrated flavour found in Dentastix.

When you read between the lines on your current pet food labels, you may find that the end product does not contain any real or fresh meat at all. This clever, but I believe unscrupulous trick, is used by a number of pet food manufacturers. That fact is that only a small amount of ‘chicken digest’ is needed to make a ‘chicken flavoured dog treat’

 I believe dog treats should be as natural as possible and not created by artificial ingredients and chemical reactions

©Stan Rawlinson (Doglistener)

September 16th 2018
Updated regularly the last update April 2019

Strange as it may seem, if you put in any of my links below by just typing the words into Google search, I will come first in every case except for Separation Anxiety Dogs, where I come second.

(1) Dog Food and Behaviour

(2) Bakers and Pedigree

(3) Royal Canin, Burns and Hills Science Plan

(4) Dog Treats and Obesity...

(5) All About Dog Food

(6) Doglistener Own Brand of Totally Natural Air Dried Treats

(7) Separation Anxiety Dogs

(8) My Thanks to Pooch and Mutt For Dentastix Image Plus a full breakdown of ingredients in Dentastix

Free Subscription to Stan Rawlinson's Fascinating Newsletters